Skip to main content

Context is Everything - AI Strategy & Implementation Consultancy

AI consultancy focused on context-first implementation. We analyse how things actually work before suggesting solutions. Our team combines enterprise software expertise, operational transformation experience, and strategic AI analysis.

Our Team

Visit our conversational AI interface to discuss your specific situation and explore whether AI implementation makes sense for your context.

Your Buyers Are AI-Native. Is Your Marketing? - Thought leadership article by Context is Everything on AI implementation

Your Buyers Are AI-Native. Is Your Marketing?

·12 min read·626 words
B2B MarketingAI ReadinessMarketing TransformationForrester ResearchBuyer Behavior

90% of B2B buyers use AI at every buying stage, but only 20% of marketing organizations have embedded AI in workflows. Understanding the five-to-one gap and strategies for closing it.

Something curious is happening in B2B buying. According to Forrester's 2025 research, nine in ten business buyers now use AI at every stage of their purchasing journey. Meanwhile, only two in ten marketing organisations have actually embedded AI into their workflows.

That's not a small gap. That's a fundamental mismatch in how buyers want to engage and how sellers are equipped to engage.

What's Actually Happening

B2B buyers are using AI tools to research vendors, compare solutions, and validate their decisions. They're asking AI to summarise whitepapers, identify key differentiators, and spot gaps in vendor claims. They're having AI draft comparison tables and generate questions for sales calls.

This isn't future behaviour. It's happening now, across industries, at every company size.

Meanwhile, most marketing teams remain in what Forrester calls the experimentation phase. They've run pilots. They've tested tools. They've created some AI-generated content. But very few have moved AI from interesting experiment to embedded capability.

The result? A growing disconnect. Buyers are conducting AI-assisted research on vendors who aren't prepared for AI-assisted scrutiny.

Why This Creates Problems

When buyers use AI to evaluate you, they're essentially crowdsourcing intelligence from everything publicly available about your company. Your website content, case studies, customer reviews, analyst reports, social media presence, competitor comparisons—all of it becomes training data for their buying decision.

If your content is inconsistent, your value proposition unclear, or your differentiation weak, AI tools will surface those gaps. They'll compare your claims against competitors'. They'll identify contradictions between your marketing messages and customer feedback. They'll highlight what you're not saying as clearly as what you are.

This isn't about AI being unfair. It's about AI being thorough in ways human researchers might not be. A buyer might read your homepage and three case studies. AI reads everything, cross-references it, and identifies patterns—both strengths and weaknesses.

Organisations that haven't thought about how their content performs under AI-assisted scrutiny may find themselves at a disadvantage they don't even know exists.

What's Changing

The organisations beginning to close this gap share some common approaches. They're not necessarily doing more with AI—they're doing different things.

Rather than focusing only on using AI to create more content, they're using it to stress-test their messaging. They're asking: "How does our positioning compare to competitors' when AI summarises both?" They're identifying content gaps by analysing what questions buyers ask AI that their content doesn't answer.

They're also being more honest about readiness. Forrester's framework identifies five areas that need attention:

  • Vision and objectives
  • Governance
  • Technology infrastructure
  • Data quality
  • Team skills
  • Most organisations experimenting with AI focus on technology—the tools themselves. The ones making progress attend to all five dimensions.

    Perhaps most importantly, they're accepting that this shift requires fixing some foundational issues first. If your content governance is weak, AI will amplify that weakness. The technology doesn't fix unclear thinking—it exposes it.

    The Shift Required

    The 90/20 gap suggests we're at an inflection point. Buyers have moved faster than sellers expected. The question isn't whether to update your navigation tools, but how quickly it's possible to do so without losing your way in the process.

    This probably isn't about matching buyers' AI sophistication tool-for-tool. It's more likely about ensuring your content, positioning, and value proposition can withstand AI-assisted scrutiny. That your differentiation is clear enough to survive algorithmic comparison. That your claims are consistent enough to hold up under cross-referencing.

    Not every organisation needs to be AI-native tomorrow. But understanding that your buyers increasingly are—and adjusting accordingly—seems less like a choice and more like a necessity.

    ---

    *Statistics and framework references from Forrester Research, "Generative AI: A Pragmatic Guide for B2B CMOs" (2025)

    Related Articles